Effective range carbon dating the dating skills fast track system
After this, the proportion of 14-C to 12-C steadily declines. 141, page 636, August 16, 1963) showed the shell from a living mollusk to be dead for 3,000 years!
This supposedly allows one to date an object by the proportion of 14-C to 12-C. Tests of Hawaiian lava flows known to be less than 200 years old have been dated up to 3 billion years old! That is, the scientists themselves do not know the effective range for 14-C.
(They conveniently forget to mention that the tree ring chronology was arranged by C14 dating.
The scientists who were trying to build the chronology found the tree rings so ambiguous that they could not decide which rings matched which (using the bristlecone pine).
Despite this she continually uses the c14 dates to create 'absolute' chronologies.
She says this is ok so long as you take into account the correction factors from dendrochronology.
If you have any more questions about it don't hesitate to write.
(2.) I just listened to a series of lectures on archaeology put out by John Hopkins Univ.
He understood that archaeological artifacts were readily available.
We believe all the dates over 5,000 years are really compressible into the next 2,000 years back to creation.
So when you hear of a date of 30,000 years for a carbon date we believe it to be early after creation and only about 7,000 years old.
In fact, 14C is forming FASTER than the observed decay rate.
This skews the 'real' answer to a much younger age.If something carbon dates at 7,000 years we believe 5,000 is probably closer to reality (just before the flood).